Types of Emissions and Building Blocks of Net-Zero Transformation

Global mean temperatures are projected to increase by 3.7 to 4.8°C, which would lead to catastrophic and irreversible effects on humanity and Earth’s ecosystems. In December 2015, the first global agreement of its kind was made when governments committed to maintaining the global temperature within this 2°C limit, to keep the temperature rise to 1.5°C – the Paris Agreement. It is a legally binding international treaty that sets long-term goals to guide all nations:

  • Substantially reduce global GHG emissions to limit the global temperature increase in this century to 2 degrees Celsius along with efforts to limit the increase even further to 1.5 degrees.
  • Review countries’ commitments every five years
  • Provide financing to developing countries to mitigate climate change

Industrial emissions are a major contributor to the global emissions landscape. A substantial portion of our electricity continues to be generated through the burning of coal, oil, or gas. These practices release potent greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, creating a heat-trapping blanket that contributes to global warming. Sectors such as manufacturing, food processing, mining, and construction further amplify emissions through various processes, including on-site combustion of fossil fuels for heat and power, non-energy use of fossil fuels, and chemical procedures involved in iron, steel, and cement production.

Businesses must reduce their environmental impact. One of the most significant ways to do this is by reducing their carbon footprint, and this starts with monitoring carbon emissions. But what are emission scopes 1, 2 & 3 (as defined by the GHG Protocol)

Often, emissions along the value chain represent the biggest GHG impact. For decades, companies have missed significant opportunities for improvement.

What is Net Zero?

Net zero means becoming carbon neutral. In simple words, net zero means cutting greenhouse gas emissions to as close to zero as possible, with any remaining emissions re-absorbed from the atmosphere, by oceans and forests for instance.

Governments have the biggest responsibility in the transition to net-zero emissions by mid-century. But businesses, investors, cities, states, and regions also need to live up to their net-zero promises.

Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions

The term first appeared in the Green House Gas Protocol of 2001; Scopes are the basis for mandatory GHG reporting. Scopes provide a framework for categorizing and reporting GHG emissions, helping organizations assess and disclose their environmental impact. The emissions are broadly classified into 3 categories.

Scope 1 emissions— The Green House Gas (GHG) emissions that a company makes directly.

Scope 2 emissions — These are the indirect emissions that a company makes. For example – when the electricity or energy it buys for heating and cooling buildings, is being produced on its behalf.  An organisation can source renewable electricity, renewable gas, or electrify its heat demand or transition to electric vehicles.

Scope 3 emissions — This category encompasses all emissions linked not to the company directly, but rather those for which the organization bears indirect responsibility along its value chain. These emissions stem from various sources, such as purchasing products from suppliers and the emissions resulting from customers’ use of the company’s products. In terms of emissions, Scope 3 emissions account for the largest portion.

Companies will normally have the source data needed to convert direct purchases of gas and electricity into a value in tonnes of GHGs. This information may sit with procurement, finance, estate management, or in sustainability functions.

Scope 1 and 2 are most within an organisation’s control and in some cases the solution for net zero is available.

For numerous businesses, Scope 3 emissions make up more than 70 per cent of their total carbon footprint. Take, for instance, an organization involved in manufacturing products; substantial carbon emissions arise from the extraction, manufacturing, and processing of raw materials.

To address these emissions, you can consider collaborating with current suppliers to find solutions that reduce their impact or explore potential changes in your supply chain. However, it’s essential to recognize that suppliers also play a significant role in emission reduction through their own purchasing decisions and product design.

While defining what constitutes net-zero ambition can be complex, businesses striving for best practices will commit to addressing Scope 3 emissions in their plans. A great starting point is mapping your emissions footprint, analysing the scale and the degree of control you have over each source. Prioritizing emissions hotspots that are within your reach will be a practical approach to tackling them effectively.

Building blocks to achieving net-zero

The recent surge in corporate net zero commitments is a vital and promising development, but there is still much more to do. Out of the close to 300 companies with public net zero pledges today, many commitments remain vague in how value chain emissions will be tackled, and downstream emissions from products, services, and investments. These are the largest sources of emissions for most companies (referred to as Scope 3 emissions) and failure to address these emissions will fail to achieve a net zero economy. Furthermore, companies are still at the very early stages of embedding net zero into business and supply chain strategy and transformation efforts. As net-zero requires full value chain transformation, companies cannot act alone, and success will be dependent on a common and accelerated path forward.

Critically, the end goal is not just net zero, but a thriving, socially just, net zero future. Marginalised groups and low-income communities often bear the greatest impacts of climate change and there will be transitional implications for workers, sectors, communities, and regions that will need to be managed. Companies must help enable the conditions needed to achieve effective, just, and sustainable climate solutions for people of all gender, race, and skills. Examples include proactively driving inclusivity and social impact of new net zero products and solutions, upskilling and reskilling to enable an inclusive workforce transition, upskilling and broader support for SME partners and suppliers, integration of social metrics into reporting and disclosure around net zero, and incorporating inclusion and a “just transition” into policy advocacy efforts.

For companies to deliver their net zero commitments, they will need to undertake end-to-end business transformation. This includes understanding the implications of net zero for a company’s growth strategy and operating model and embedding net zero across all business functions from governance, to supply chains, to finance and innovation.

Building blocks for corporate net zero transformation. This ‘blueprint’ seeks to help companies move from willingness to implementation: This blog briefly defines the checklist of critical actions needed to undertake to transform to net zero and explains why these actions are important.

Building ambition – It’s of utmost importance to ensurethat your company has the intention of becoming carbon neutral and to make sure your net-zero targets are aligned with global ambition. The net-zero vision should set out timeframes and accountability, how the company intends to decarbonize emissions from its operations and value chain, its approach too hard to eliminate residual emissions through offsetting, and an enabling investment strategy.

Strategy across the supply chain – To achieve net-zero emissions, companies must develop a comprehensive strategy that addresses emissions throughout their entire supply chain. This means not only focusing on their direct operations (Scope 1 emissions) and energy consumption (Scope 2 emissions) but also tackling emissions associated with their suppliers, customers, and other partners. A well-defined strategy across the supply chain is important to identify and to help mitigate the largest sources of emissions ensuring a holistic approach to achieving net-zero.

Cost effective and sustainable innovation –Net-zero transformation requires innovative solutions that are both environmentally sustainable and economically viable. Companies need to invest in research and development to drive sustainable innovation, finding ways to reduce emissions without compromising the quality and competitiveness of their products and services. Embracing green technologies, renewable energy, and resource-efficient processes will be essential indriving meaningful progress towards the goal.

Engagement and transparent – Open communication and engagement with stakeholders are vital for successful net-zero implementation. Companies should involve employees, customers, investors, suppliers, and local communities in their net-zero journey. Transparent reporting on emissions reduction progress and sharing climate-related data will build trust and accountability. Moreover, engaging with external organizations and industry peers can foster collaboration and shared learning, accelerating the transition to a net-zero economy.

In house capability/ capacity – Achieving net-zero requires skilled professionals who can lead and execute the transformation initiatives effortlessly within the company. Building in-house capability and capacity through training and upskilling employees is crucial to drive change successfully. Companies should invest in developing expertise in sustainability, carbon accounting, and other relevant fields, enabling them to make informed decisions and implement sustainable practices across all business functions.

While these building blocks serve as a starting point for companies to begin their journey towards net-zero, it’s important to recognise that each company’s path will be unique. Flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement are essential as companies navigate the complexities of the net-zero transition. By taking decisive actions across their supply chain, fostering innovation, being transparent, and investing in their workforce, companies can contribute to a socially just, thriving, net-zero future for all.

Cold Chain Infrastructure in Kenya: Challenges and Potential Interventions

Kenya’s domestic market is more than 56 million people and is considered one of East Africa’s core business and logistics hubs. Agriculture is the backbone of Kenya’s economy and central to the country’s development strategy. It accounts for 31.5% of Kenya’s GDP and employs 38% of the population.Despite this, food insecurity persists, with 4 million people facing extreme shortages during the 2022 drought. Limited access to markets and poor post-harvest practices contribute to 40% of food waste. The rising population, climate change, and disruptions in food supply chains pose further challenges, making an effective Cold Chain Infrastructure (CCI) crucial to mitigate many of these challenges.

A well-designed and developed cold chain can prevent food losses and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to food waste. Cold chains also ensure food security by reducing food price inflation, buffering the food supply, and overcoming seasonal shortfalls. This buffering mechanism dampens the price fluctuations that typically put vulnerable communities at risk of poverty and hunger and better supports the growth of farmers’ incomes.

Challenges faced by Kenya in growing CCI:

  • Limited technical skills to provide after-sales services.
  • Affordability – Cooling interventions need to be affordable and add value for farmers operating on thin margins. Usage-based payment models like CaaS, group ownership, and lease-to-own (PAYGO) can help reduce adoption barriers.
  • Consumer awareness: There is limited awareness, especially among rural smallholder farmers, of the benefits of using cold chain solutions.
  • Market dynamics and maturity: In Kenya, most food production is consumed within the country, and informal channels are common for selling products. For instance, over 99% of meat and 96% of fruits and vegetables are consumed locally through farmgate or domestic markets. Unlike export markets, domestic markets typically lack strict regulations and standards that require the use of a cold chain. While some players may use cold chain methods to extend produce shelf life, cooling is not mandatory.
  • Lack of investment: Access to affordable debt and equity for service providers is needed, but the sector is still relatively young, and the financial needs are diverse. More established companies are ready for long-term patient capital and concessional loans. However, there is still a need for grants and programme support for market development activities
  • Weak transportation infrastructure: Poor road conditions and traffic congestion increase travel time and increase the risk of perishable products becoming damaged and spoiled. In addition, poor roads and infrastructure can damage refrigerated trucks/vehicles, resulting in the leakage of high GWP refrigerants
  • Inconsistent policies: Tariff regimes are inconsistent, and agro-based products have a favourable import duty, but it’s unclear if this is applicable to all value chains (e.g., meat and fish) and for components. The lack of national standards for energy performance and food quality also inhibits market growth
  • Availability of equipment and suppliers: The development of a clean cold chain will have to be preceded by policies that encourage the import of cold-chain equipment in the country by local firms or even incentivise foreign firms to set up subsidiaries. That means that an entire industry will have to be developed or at least nurtured, including local manufacturers being encouraged/incentivised to undertake production.

Key recommendations for carious stakeholder Groups in Kenya’s CCI Sector

xr:d:DAFvn3wv324:2,j:29677603515831815,t:23092707

Challenges that Inhibit the Uptake of CCI Solutions

Several factors inhibit the adoption of CCI technologies on the side of both users and manufacturers. These challenges are as follows:

Financing challenges: Financing is challenging for enterprises/service providers and consumers/beneficiaries. Limited financing is available to enterprises creating and providing CCI, as well as to end consumers looking to acquire these technologies

Technological challenges: While technological innovation has been seen in the CCI sector, several challenges still exist. These include the availability of technicians required to manage installation and after-sales services, both critical to adopting new technologies. Meanwhile, poor-quality products negatively impact how customers view the entire sector, while limited local manufacturing capacity hinders local job creation and leads to import substitution.

Market and operational challenges: These include policy gaps regarding supply-side and demand-side incentives at the national and county levels. The immaturity of the market limits economies of scale regarding sector consolidation, bulk procurement, and the ability of individual companies to absorb commercial funding. As a result, most value chains remain primarily informal.

User challenges: The most common user-related challenge is limited familiarity with CCI solutions, including key product features like energy efficiency, usage and maintenance, and temperature control. Since most smallholder farmers are rain-dependent, the seasonality of their produce also impacts the utilisation rates of CCI assets, especially those using CaaS models. This has long-term impacts on technology providers’ margins, leading to more extended payback periods.

Potential Interventions to Increase the Uptake of CCI Solutions

Various strategies could be adopted to increase the uptake of CCI solutions in the country and to ensure they scale by 2030. Some of these strategies are as follows:

Increase patient capital in the sector: To promote CCI adoption, the sector requires more patient and catalytic capital, including long-term equity from commercial investors and grant financing. Targeted recipients are companies involved in CCI solutions and MFIs providing consumer financing for farmers.

  1. A first loss default guarantee programme in which a donor agrees to deploy grant capital as part of the investment to reduce losses in case the ROI is negative, thus catalysing participation from more commercial co-investors.
  2. Results-based or performance-based financing, where an investor or financier provides patient capital to achieve measurable impact; this could be the amount of food the CCI solution “saves” from wastage.
  3. Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) include a mechanism whereby the government provides financing for an asset while the private sector player is responsible for its repair, maintenance, and the technical support required to ensure sustainability.

Re-evaluate the tax regime and reduce prices: The tax regime for CCI parts and components significantly raises their prices, accounting for almost 40% of production costs. This high cost hinders CCI adoption, particularly at the initial stage. Re-evaluating the tax system is crucial, and efforts should be made to provide tax subsidies through multistakeholder taskforces. This will lead to more affordable CCI solutions, incentivizing their uptake in the market.

Increase donor programmes that promote market development activities: Increase donor-sponsored programs to promote market development of CCI assets. Focus on building technical skills, local manufacturing, and after-sales services. Educate farmers and consumers to boost adoption. Fund successful pilots to reduce risk perception among stakeholders.

Increase processing and exports: To promote CCI technologies, Kenya should focus on increasing local food processing and exports, while adhering to Global Agricultural Practices, including cold chain requirements, to meet quality standards for export markets.

To promote CCI technologies, Kenya needs dedicated policy support and full implementation. Specific regulations can cover optimum produce temperature, pricing, and certified technical providers. Publicly funded capacity building for cooling engineers can enhance skills. Tailored recommendations for different markets can further boost CCI adoption.

For the household refrigerator market:

  • Resolve PAYG compatibility, appropriate system controls and improved reliability.
  • Develop financing solutions through micro-finance and PAYG contracts in mini-grid markets.
  • Provide after-sales technical support and the means to deliver appliances to remote regions.

For the small commercial refrigerator market:

  • Encourage development of appliances for target markets and collaborate with regional business associations and SACCOs.
  • Design “solar stalls,” soft drink coolers, and portable coolers for farmers and producers, emphasizing reliability.
  • Develop financial case templates and suitable financing packages for entrepreneurs.
  • Ensure after-sales technical support for sustained operations.

For the commercial ice-maker market:

  • Encourage targeted appliance development and collaboration with farmers’ cooperatives.
  • Focus on small agricultural, meat, fish, and dairy storage and transportation systems.
  • Provide financial case templates and suitable financing options.
  • Establish after-sales technical support.

Although use cases vary across value chains, overall, CCI in Kenya is underdeveloped in the agricultural sector, resulting in significant quantities of food lost yearly due to a lack of cold chain technology. CCI manufacturers and distributors must ensure that their products correspond to the needs and capacities of the first-mile market segment, particularly concerning the power sources they use and the payment models they adopt. In supporting innovations in cold chain technology, there should be a particular focus on products powered by renewable energy.

However, solving this problem requires more than the proper technology; a system-wide approach combining education, financing, and policy changes is needed to fully realise the cold chain market’s potential and for Kenyans to reap its benefits eventually.

Access the full report here